Skip to content
Chaser Geological

Drilling history / GEONAVIGATE INDUSTRY CHATTER

Leduc No. 1: Reading a Reef Before It Was a Field

The famous February 1947 demonstration at Leduc No. 1 opened a geological story that continued in the deeper reef. Follow the Nisku/D-2 discovery and later Leduc/D-3 appraisal through seismic clues, rock cores, early well tests, carbonate pore space and changing reservoir understanding.

Recorded17:10 · measured recordingAI narration: Dorian

Prepared

THE ILLUSTRATED EPISODE

Watch the full episode

17:10 · 1080p · English captions

Dated archival and modern photographs, original conceptual diagrams and animations, and one clearly labelled AI paleoenvironment illustration. AI narration: Dorian.

THE RECORDING17:10 measured duration

CHAPTER 01

The flame beside the derrick

Imperial Leduc No.1, 13 February 1947. A flame and black smoke rise beside the derrick; snow and earth banks are visible in the foreground.
Historical imageImperial Leduc No.1, 13 February 1947. A flame and black smoke rise beside the derrick; snow and earth banks are visible in the foreground.Provincial Archives of Alberta, P2721 · No known copyright restrictions (official Provincial Archives of Alberta Flickr Commons statement) · Image record ↗ · Licence ↗
Different evidence answers different questions
Original diagramCuttings, core, logs, flow tests and offset wells contribute different kinds of evidence. This is an original explanatory diagram.GeoNavigate original technical illustration; historical and geological sources credited below. · Original GeoNavigate explanatory artwork.

On February thirteenth, nineteen forty-seven, visitors gathered at an oil well southwest of Edmonton. The photographs preserve a winter scene of people and a steel derrick. A flame rose beside the installation as the discovery was demonstrated.

That afternoon became one of the defining images of Alberta's oil history. Beneath the celebration, however, the geological story was still opening. The first productive interval and the deeper reef that later transformed the field were different targets.

The first success came from the zone then called D two, now the Nisku Formation. Follow-up drilling would establish production from D three, the deeper carbonate buildup later named the Leduc Formation. Keeping those two zones separate changes how we read the discovery.

This is GeoNavigate Industry Chatter, narrated by the AI voice Dorian. Our story is Leduc Number One: Reading a Reef Before It Was a Field.

We will follow the evidence from a seismic prospect to a rock sample, from a sample to a flowing test, and from a successful well to the much harder task of understanding a connected reservoir.

Chapter sources91716118

CHAPTER 02

A prospect beneath the plains

Upward view through a derrick with suspended hoisting equipment at the Canadian Energy Museum, photographed by Jason Woodhead on 9 August 2018.
Modern photographUpward view through a derrick with suspended hoisting equipment at the Canadian Energy Museum, photographed by Jason Woodhead on 9 August 2018. The display is not authenticated as the original 1947 No. 1 derrick.Jason Woodhead / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0 · Image record ↗ · Licence ↗
The discovery sequence
Original diagramA timeline separates the 20 November 1946 spud, 13 February 1947 public demonstration and deeper D-3 appraisal in May 1947.GeoNavigate original technical illustration; historical and geological sources credited below. · Original GeoNavigate explanatory artwork.

The search moved across a landscape where the important rocks were largely hidden. Glacial deposits covered the plains. A farm field could give little direct view of the Devonian succession far below it. Exploration needed a way to connect scattered observations beneath that cover.

Imperial Oil had the organization and capital to continue a regional search, drawing on geologists, geophysical crews and drilling teams. The prospect near Leduc became one decision within that wider effort, with technical interpretations guiding where an expensive hole would begin.

The discovery is often remembered as the end of a long run of unsuccessful wells and a final gamble. That story conveys the disappointment preceding success, but it compresses a complicated exploration history. Different crews, locations and geological targets belonged to that wider search.

The surviving technical account gives us a more useful sequence to investigate: reconnaissance, detailed seismic work, a selected location and a drilling programme capable of testing the interpretation.

For the people approving the well, the decision concerned a prospect. For those of us looking backward, it is tempting to place the completed field map on their desk. Their uncertainty was real, and it deserves a place in the story.

Chapter sources19141112

CHAPTER 03

What the seismic could suggest

Seismic drilling rig/truck display at the Canadian Energy Museum, photographed by Jason Woodhead on 9 August 2018.
Modern photographSeismic drilling rig/truck display at the Canadian Energy Museum, photographed by Jason Woodhead on 9 August 2018. The displayed truck has no established link to the 1946 Leduc survey.Jason Woodhead / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0 · Image record ↗ · Licence ↗
A reflection is a clue
Original diagramConceptual seismic travel paths and an illustrative trace; these are not the original 1946 survey data.GeoNavigate original technical illustration; historical and geological sources credited below. · Original GeoNavigate explanatory artwork.

In nineteen forty-six, seismic work helped direct the search beneath central Alberta. A technical paper by D. B. Layer and Imperial's geological staff later credited reconnaissance by a Carter Oil crew and detailed work by a Heiland Exploration crew in locating the discovery well.

Reflection seismic begins with a disturbance that travels through the ground. Some energy returns from boundaries where rock properties change. Receivers record those arrivals. Their timing helps an interpreter investigate the arrangement of the rocks below.

Our animation is a conceptual explanation of that process. The moving wave paths and simplified trace are teaching devices. They are not a recovered seismic record from the nineteen forty-six survey.

A promising geological feature still leaves crucial questions. Is the rock porous? Are its pores connected? What fluid occupies them? Seismic interpretation helps define a drilling question; rock samples and well tests supply different kinds of evidence.

Even a promising interpretation remained a proposition to test. A seismic prospect did not yet supply a sample, a measured producing interval or a demonstrated flow rate. The drill would provide the next direct encounter with the succession.

Chapter sources142519

CHAPTER 04

The hole becomes a rock record

Workers handle equipment around drill pipe on a Leduc rig floor, circa 1948. Archive title: Leduc oil rigs and drillers.
Historical imageWorkers handle equipment around drill pipe on a Leduc rig floor, circa 1948. Archive title: Leduc oil rigs and drillers. The source does not identify this as No. 1 or name the workers.Provincial Archives of Alberta, PA407/5 · No known copyright restrictions (official Provincial Archives of Alberta Flickr Commons statement) · Image record ↗ · Licence ↗
Rock and mineral teaching display at the Canadian Energy Museum, photographed by Jason Woodhead on 9 August 2018.
Modern photographRock and mineral teaching display at the Canadian Energy Museum, photographed by Jason Woodhead on 9 August 2018. The teaching specimens are not authenticated No. 1 discovery core.Jason Woodhead / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0 · Image record ↗ · Licence ↗
Rotary table, kelly and swivel display at the Canadian Energy Museum, photographed by Jason Woodhead on 9 August 2018.
Modern photographRotary table, kelly and swivel display at the Canadian Energy Museum, photographed by Jason Woodhead on 9 August 2018. A modern exhibit, not an operating 1947 photograph. Display orientation follows EXIF.Jason Woodhead / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 2.0 · Image record ↗ · Licence ↗
Recovering a rock cylinder
Original diagramConceptual conventional coring: the bit cuts around a central cylinder, fluid descends between the barrels and returns in the outer annulus. Exact 1947 tool geometry is not reconstructed.GeoNavigate original technical illustration; historical and geological sources credited below. · Original GeoNavigate explanatory artwork.

Drilling began on November twentieth, nineteen forty-six. Toolpusher Vern Hunter and the crew worked through the succession with a rotary rig. Each additional interval brought material to examine and a reason to compare the developing well with the interpretation that had justified it.

Cuttings provide fragments. A conventional core preserves a cylinder of rock and more of its internal arrangement. Bedding, fossils, fractures and changes in texture can then be examined together, with depth control linking the observations to a particular interval.

In the generic coring animation, an annular bit cuts around the central rock cylinder. That cylinder enters the inner barrel. Circulating fluid passes between the inner and outer barrels and returns outside the tool with the cuttings.

The animation explains a general mechanism. The discovery well's provincial report records continuous coring without specifying the precise tool assembly.

A sample can reveal promising texture and an oil show. The next questions concern scale and connection: how much of the interval shares that texture, and can fluids move through the formation into the well?

Chapter sources1911202313

CHAPTER 05

D two above D three

Nisku above the deeper Leduc reef
Original diagramConceptual stratigraphic section separating the No. 1 Nisku/D-2 interval from the deeper Leduc/D-3 buildup. Thicknesses and well spacing are schematic.GeoNavigate original technical illustration; historical and geological sources credited below. · Original GeoNavigate explanatory artwork.

The old zone names are essential to the story. D two was the first productive zone of the Leduc field. The Nisku name later replaced that informal designation. D three referred to the deeper reef interval that became the Leduc Formation.

Leduc Number One established the Nisku discovery. Later wells, including Leduc Number Two and Number Three, opened the deeper Leduc reservoir. The D three discovery followed in May nineteen forty-seven, after the famous February celebration.

The diagram keeps the relationships visible. A younger Nisku carbonate interval lies above shale and the older Leduc buildup. The reef grew above a carbonate platform and was surrounded and eventually buried by finer sediment.

The section is deliberately conceptual. It carries no measured distance between the historical wells, and its thicknesses do not substitute for a well log. Its purpose is to keep the two reservoirs and their order clear.

Later formation names help us describe the rock precisely. They can also make a discovery story seem more complete than it was at the time. The early D two and D three terminology preserves a sense of that developing geological picture.

Chapter sources1615145

CHAPTER 06

A public demonstration of a tested well

Imperial Leduc No.1, 13 February 1947. Spectators stand beside the rig and a pit, with a stream issuing from a pipe toward the pit.
Historical imageImperial Leduc No.1, 13 February 1947. Spectators stand beside the rig and a pit, with a stream issuing from a pipe toward the pit.Provincial Archives of Alberta, P2723 · No known copyright restrictions (official Provincial Archives of Alberta Flickr Commons statement) · Image record ↗ · Licence ↗
The flare beside the derrick
Original diagramConceptual surface-flow route to a separate flare. The layout does not claim to recover the exact historical piping.GeoNavigate original technical illustration; historical and geological sources credited below. · Original GeoNavigate explanatory artwork.

By the time visitors arrived on February thirteenth, the well had already provided evidence that it could produce. The public event gave that developing result a visible moment. Photographs of the gathering and the flare became part of the memory of the discovery.

Vern Hunter's later recollection is especially useful for interpreting the scene. He described a controlled flow carried through piping to the flare line. The flame visible beside the derrick belongs in that surface arrangement.

The distinction matters when recreating the event. An oil jet erupting through the top of a derrick would tell a different operational story. Our video uses the dated photographs and a clearly labelled flow-path explanation to keep the actual account recognizable.

The crowd could see a successful demonstration. The subsurface questions continued: the character of the producing interval, the behaviour of the fluid, and the continuity of the reservoir away from the hole.

A discovery day gives an industry a date to remember. A well record gives geologists and engineers something they can continue to test. At Leduc, both forms of evidence survive, and they explain different parts of the achievement.

Chapter sources91118

CHAPTER 07

Read the first test figures carefully

Read the test conditions
Original diagramReported completion depth, recovery interval, early volume and later daily runs retain their separate conditions. The illustration does not assign an unsupported depth datum or sustainable forecast.GeoNavigate original technical illustration; historical and geological sources credited below. · Original GeoNavigate explanatory artwork.
Limited excerpt from the original March 1947 report
Original diagramA 19-word facsimile excerpt from J. L. Irwin’s Alberta Oil Review 1946, published March 1947. Surrounding report text is omitted. The full source is linked below.GeoNavigate original panel; source material credited below. · Image record ↗

Alberta's Oil Review, published in March nineteen forty-seven, records completion at five thousand and sixty-six feet. Oil came from five thousand and twenty-nine to five thousand and sixty-six feet.

Initial flush production was approximately five hundred and fifty barrels in fourteen hours.

Later test runs through different chokes produced about two hundred to three hundred barrels daily.

Two of the drillstem tests showed small water indications, although the report recorded none during drilling.

Those figures preserve different conditions. They establish a useful starting record without defining a permanent production rate or explaining every fluid observation.

Chapter sources13

CHAPTER 08

A test asks whether the rock is connected

A test asks about connected rock
Original diagramConceptual test sequence and qualitative pressure trace. This is not a recovered Leduc No. 1 record.GeoNavigate original technical illustration; historical and geological sources credited below. · Original GeoNavigate explanatory artwork.

A drillstem test creates a controlled opportunity to observe how a formation responds. In a generic test assembly, a packer isolates the interval and a valve allows formation fluid to enter the test string. Pressure gauges record the response.

Opening the valve changes the pressure conditions. As fluid enters the string, the pressure trace evolves. During a shut-in period, the response toward formation pressure provides another part of the evidence. Flow and recovery are read together.

Our animation shows those broad relationships, with a qualitative pressure trace. It is neither an operating procedure nor a copy of a Leduc Number One pressure chart. Actual interpretation requires the recorded times, pressures, tool configuration and recovered fluids.

The geological value lies in the connection between a rock interval and a fluid response. A promising-looking pore in a sample is a small observation. A test investigates whether the formation around the well can communicate through its connected pore system.

That is why the rock description and the test report should sit beside each other. They answer related questions at different scales, and disagreement between them is often where the next useful investigation begins.

Chapter sources212224

CHAPTER 09

Return to the Devonian sea

A reef grows and is buried
Original diagramConceptual carbonate buildup, basin flanks and later burial. Regional relationships vary; the drawing is not a measured section through No. 1.GeoNavigate original technical illustration; historical and geological sources credited below. · Original GeoNavigate explanatory artwork.
AI illustration of a Devonian reef community with stromatoporoid sponges, corals, crinoids and brachiopods.
AI reconstructionAI-created paleoenvironment illustration of a Devonian reef community. Colours and organism placement are interpretive. It is not a photograph, authenticated discovery core or a measured reconstruction.GeoNavigate; AI-generated illustration. · Original generated illustration prepared for GeoNavigate.

To understand the deeper reservoir, we have to return to a much older landscape: a shallow marine setting in the Late Devonian. Carbonate sediment accumulated around communities of organisms whose skeletons helped build the developing reef complexes.

Stromatoporoids, ancient reef-building sponges, were especially important. Their growth forms varied across the environment. Corals, brachiopods and other organisms contributed to the community and to the skeletal material that became part of the rock.

The paleoenvironment illustration offers an interpreted view of that setting. The image is labelled as AI illustration. The precise arrangement and colours of the organisms are illustrative; the geological explanation rests on the fossil and sedimentary evidence.

Around the buildups, different sediments accumulated. In the Leduc type area, Duvernay and Ireton basin sediments enclosed the carbonate, and later shale deposition covered it. The growing reef and the surrounding basin formed parts of the same evolving system.

Burial changed that original landscape again. What the drill eventually entered was an ancient environment transformed into rock, then altered through a long history of fluids, cementation and chemical change.

Chapter sources1514

CHAPTER 10

A reef needs connected pore space

Space must connect
Original diagramIdealized connected pores, dead ends and isolated cavities. Grain shapes, pore sizes and flow rates are illustrative.GeoNavigate original technical illustration; historical and geological sources credited below. · Original GeoNavigate explanatory artwork.

A reef origin does not give every piece of rock the same reservoir quality. Original skeletal spaces may survive, become filled with cement, or be modified by later alteration. Neighbouring intervals can therefore share a broad geological name and behave differently when tested.

Dolomitization was important in many Leduc buildups. Magnesium-bearing fluids altered the original carbonate. The resulting textures and pore systems reflect both the starting material and the history of fluid movement through it. Other reefs retained substantial limestone.

The pore-flow animation separates available space from connected pathways. Fluid can occupy a large cavity with little communication to surrounding pores. Smaller spaces joined through a continuous network can transmit fluid more effectively than isolated holes.

For the geologist examining core, that means recording more than the presence of a visible opening. Its setting, distribution and connections matter. Laboratory measurements and pressure behaviour can then test what the visible texture suggests.

The best reservoir description joins those observations. It explains where the pore space occurs, how it connects, how the rock changes across the interval, and what remains uncertain between the places actually sampled.

Chapter sources2152427

CHAPTER 11

An appraisal map grows one well at a time

Consolidated Oil wells Nos.2 and 3 near Leduc, 31 August 1947. A derrick, tank/storage area and harvested crop field are visible.
Historical imageConsolidated Oil wells Nos.2 and 3 near Leduc, 31 August 1947. A derrick, tank/storage area and harvested crop field are visible. These are Consolidated Oil wells, distinct from Imperial Leduc Nos. 2 and 3.Provincial Archives of Alberta, KS61/1 · No known copyright restrictions (official Provincial Archives of Alberta Flickr Commons statement) · Image record ↗ · Licence ↗
A field map grows one well at a time
Original diagramHypothetical well results update an uncertain interpretation. No actual historical well coordinates or field boundary are implied.GeoNavigate original technical illustration; historical and geological sources credited below. · Original GeoNavigate explanatory artwork.

The provincial report records Leduc Number Two spudding on February twelfth, a day before Number One's public celebration. Appraisal was already under way.

The deeper discovery expanded the geological question. Wells had to establish the carbonate buildup, its limits, the distribution of reservoir quality and the relationships between the productive zones. Each new result could support or revise the emerging interpretation.

In their nineteen forty-nine paper, Layer and Imperial's geological staff described D two as a broad blanket-type deposit with variable porosity, while D three appeared reefal. They also acknowledged that development was still too incomplete to settle the structural picture.

Our animated appraisal map uses hypothetical well positions to show the logic. A confirmed result adds local control; an uncertain boundary remains uncertain until more evidence constrains it. The changing outline is not a historical map of the Leduc field.

That distinction remains useful today. Drawing a smooth line through sparse control does not add another measurement. A good geological map communicates both the interpreted shape and the observations that support it.

Chapter sources1314277

CHAPTER 12

The oil leg changes with development

A dated oil-leg comparison
Original diagramThe 1984 paper compares an original 11.6-metre oil leg with an estimated 1.5 metres remaining in the D-3A Main Pool. Only oil-band thickness is proportional; the comparison is not No. 1 Nisku data or a current reserve estimate.GeoNavigate original technical illustration; historical and geological sources credited below. · Original GeoNavigate explanatory artwork.

Decades later, a technical account reveals another stage of the story. A nineteen eighty-four paper by Esso Resources staff examined the Leduc D three A pool. This was the deeper reservoir, distinct from the Nisku interval discovered in Number One.

The authors described a relatively thin oil leg between a large gas cap and the active Cooking Lake aquifer. That arrangement made reservoir management a continuing effort to understand the position and behaviour of the oil between the other fluids.

They reported an original oil-leg thickness of eleven point six metres. By nineteen eighty-four, the remaining thickness in the Main Pool was estimated at one point five metres. Those figures describe that historical assessment, not the current state of the field.

The animation illustrates the narrowing space occupied by oil between gas and water. Its geometry is conceptual, and it predicts no future recovery. The historical measurements belong to the named pool and the period of the paper.

A field's geological framework persists while its fluid distribution changes. The discovery opened an opportunity; decades of production created a different set of questions about the reservoir that remained.

Chapter sources5161

CHAPTER 13

A producing well needs a route to market

Continental No.9 at Woodbend, 10 August 1948. A group stands in a field in front of a derrick and a large flare.
Historical imageContinental No.9 at Woodbend, 10 August 1948. A group stands in a field in front of a derrick and a large flare. This is a later, separately named well, not the February 1947 discovery demonstration.Provincial Archives of Alberta, KS65/1 · No known copyright restrictions (official Provincial Archives of Alberta Flickr Commons statement) · Image record ↗ · Licence ↗
The route from a discovery to market
Original diagramAn original explanatory panel connecting production with storage, transport and refining. This is not a measured reconstruction of the entire historical network.GeoNavigate original panel; source material credited below. · Image record ↗

Imperial's success involved more than the producing interval. Exploration teams identified a prospect; drilling and testing established an opportunity; appraisal developed it. Transport, refining and sales then had to turn the recovered fluid into a sustained business.

Early oil moved by truck to Leduc, then by railway tank car to Calgary. Even this initial production needed a working route to its refinery.

As production grew, transportation capacity became a larger issue. The Canada Year Book later described the restriction imposed before the new pipeline was available. The first Interprovincial main line was built in nineteen fifty, expanding access to markets beyond the local region.

Refinery investment around Edmonton added another part of that industrial system. A successful field could encourage new facilities, skilled employment and further exploration, while those facilities improved the practical value of additional discoveries.

That is the company story behind the famous well. Geological judgement created an opening, and an organization capable of developing, moving and processing the product helped turn that opening into a durable industry.

Chapter sources13862612

CHAPTER 14

What the discovery still teaches

Atlantic No.3 out-of-control blowout at Devon, 7 September 1948. Four people are visible in the foreground and a large burning plume in the background.
Historical imageAtlantic No.3 out-of-control blowout at Devon, 7 September 1948. Four people are visible in the foreground and a large burning plume in the background. A separate 1948 disaster, shown only as the closing preview of the next episode.Provincial Archives of Alberta, KS66/6 · No known copyright restrictions (official Provincial Archives of Alberta Flickr Commons statement) · Image record ↗ · Licence ↗
Pumpjack and wellhead at the original Leduc No.1 well site, photographed by Solange Gagnebin on 21 May 2012.
Modern photographPumpjack and wellhead at the original Leduc No.1 well site, photographed by Solange Gagnebin on 21 May 2012. This modern heritage-site pumpjack is distinct from the original drilling rig.Solange Gagnebin / Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Image record ↗ · Licence ↗

Return to the two zones. Leduc Number One demonstrated the Nisku opportunity in February nineteen forty-seven. The deeper Leduc reef became a producing discovery through subsequent drilling. Together they opened a much broader exploration story beneath the plains.

The seismic prospect, the rock sample, the test response and the appraisal map were different forms of evidence. Each made the next decision better informed. None supplied the whole reservoir history by itself.

The companion includes original photographs, the provincial test account and the technical source notes. It also links to Glenbow's official presentation of A Mile Below the Wheat, Imperial's colour film released in nineteen forty-nine. Its date remains separate from the discovery-day photographs.

For a wellsite geologist, the habit is familiar: place the observations in order, keep their depths and conditions attached, and let the interpretation change when a new result demands it. That is how a promising hole becomes a field that can be understood.

This is GeoNavigate Industry Chatter. Next in the historical series is Atlantic Number Three and the problem of well control. At Leduc, the enduring achievement began with a discovery and continued with the work of learning what it meant.

Chapter sources16151431018

THE VISUAL STORY

Episode visuals

Reconstructions and conceptual diagrams are identified in their captions.

Leduc No. 1 episode title beside an authentic photograph of the 13 February 1947 flare.
Episode visualEpisode artwork built around the complete discovery-day photograph P2721, dated 13 February 1947. The typography and layout are original.GeoNavigate layout; Provincial Archives of Alberta, P2721 · No known copyright restrictions, as stated by the institution for the source photograph. · Image record ↗ · Licence ↗

THE MOVING IMAGE RECORD

Historical films to explore

Contemporary films, later documentaries and archive records are dated separately. These links open the original sources; reuse status is noted for each.

1949

A Mile Below the Wheat ↗

Imperial Oil’s 1949 film, shared by Glenbow Archives. Its release date is distinct from the dates of individual scenes. This episode links the film separately; no film excerpts are included in the GeoNavigate video.

Official viewing link. No open reuse licence for extraction or rehosting was established.

FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

Sources & notes

  1. Alberta Geological Survey: Leduc Formation StoryMap

    Alberta Geological Survey outreach account distinguishing the No. 1 Nisku success from the deeper Leduc discoveries in follow-up wells. Regional reef trends do not establish one continuously connected oil pool.

    AGSSTORY
  2. J. E. Amthor, E. W. Mountjoy and H. G. Machel, Subsurface Dolomites in Upper Devonian Leduc Formation Buildups, Central Rimbey–Meadowbrook Reef Trend

    Peer-reviewed research on subsurface dolomites in Leduc buildups. Dolomitization can alter reservoir texture; a formation name alone does not establish local pore connectivity or permeability.

    AMTHOR1993
  3. APEGA: Black Gold—Leduc No.1 Oil Strike Makes History

    Professional-association retrospective with attributed memories and an official viewing link for the 1949 Imperial film A Mile Below the Wheat.

    APEGA
  4. Geological Atlas of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, Chapter 12: Devonian Woodbend–Winterburn Strata

    Regional Woodbend–Winterburn stratigraphic synthesis. The conceptual cross-sections explain relationships and depositional history; they are not measured sections through No. 1.

    ATLAS12
  5. G. L. Barfoot, R. J. Rodgers and B. R. Scarth, Leduc, A New Life At 38

    Operator paper published in 1984; the publisher abstract, introduction and opening geology text were consulted. The 11.6-metre original and estimated 1.5-metre remaining oil-leg comparison refers to the Leduc D-3A Main Pool in 1984, not the Nisku discovery well or present-day reserves.

    BARFOOT1984
  6. Canada Energy Regulator: Enbridge Canadian Mainline pipeline profile

    Regulator history of the pipeline system. The modern network is not shown as a reconstructed 1950 route map.

    CERMAINLINE
  7. Canada Year Book 1947, petroleum discussion

    Contemporary federal petroleum discussion used for the early field-development context. Historical production and drilling figures retain their original reporting period.

    CYB1947
  8. Canada Year Book 1951, mineral resources: Alberta

    Federal account of Alberta petroleum development and infrastructure around 1950. Historical milestones are kept separate from the modern network.

    CYB1951
  9. Alberta Energy Heritage: Leduc Discovery Day

    Official Alberta account incorporating Vern Hunter’s later recollection of discovery day. The visible flare was beside the derrick; the episode does not portray an invented derrick-top gusher.

    DAY
  10. Glenbow Archives / University of Calgary: A Mile Below the Wheat

    Imperial Oil film released in 1949, held by Glenbow Archives / University of Calgary. The official viewing link is provided separately. Release year is not the date of every scene, and no film footage is rehosted in this episode.

    FILM1949
  11. Alberta Energy Heritage: Vern “Dry Hole” Hunter

    Retrospective biography of Vern Hunter. His nickname and later recollections are historical context, not evidence that he personally drilled every unsuccessful Imperial well.

    HUNTER
  12. Imperial Oil: Our History

    Company retrospective timeline. Earlier Imperial operations remain part of the background; the Leduc venture is not presented as a company with no prior successes.

    IMPERIALHISTORY
  13. J. L. Irwin, Alberta Oil Review 1946 (published March 1947)

    Contemporary provincial report, printed page 9, published in March 1947 despite the 1946 review-year title. Its early test figures describe different conditions, not a sustained daily forecast. The article reproduces only a limited 19-word excerpt.

    IRWIN1947
  14. D. B. Layer and members of Imperial Oil staff, Leduc Oil Field, Alberta, A Devonian Coral-Reef Discovery

    Early operator-authored technical paper, consulted through its publisher-deposited abstract. Maps, logs and full article text were not used. Its field interpretation belongs to 1949, after the discovery.

    LAYER1949
  15. NRCan / CSPG stratigraphic lexicon: Leduc Formation

    Formal stratigraphic entry for the D-3 carbonate buildup later named the Leduc Formation. Reference-section depths and thicknesses are distinct from discovery-well measurements.

    LEDUC
  16. NRCan / CSPG stratigraphic lexicon: Nisku Formation

    Formal stratigraphic entry identifying D-2, the first productive interval of Leduc No. 1, with the later Nisku Formation. Its type-section depths are not No. 1 measurements.

    NISKU
  17. Parks Canada: Leduc–Woodbend Oilfield National Historic Site

    National historic-site designation account. The designation describes historic significance; its site boundary is not a measured geological field outline.

    PARKS
  18. Provincial Archives of Alberta: discovery-day photographs P2721 and P2723

    Provincial Archives of Alberta discovery-day photographs P2721 and P2723, dated 13 February 1947. Other images retain their own dates, credits and source records. The institution states no known copyright restrictions; this is not relabelled as a separate Creative Commons licence.

    PHOTO
  19. Alberta Energy Heritage: Preparation for the Leduc Discovery

    Official Alberta retrospective on the exploration that preceded Leduc. The familiar unsuccessful-well count is treated as retrospective shorthand for a regional program, not one crew repeatedly drilling an identical target.

    PREP
  20. SLB, The Defining Series: Downhole Coring

    Technical explanation of conventional downhole coring. The original diagram explains cutting and fluid paths generically; it is not an authenticated reconstruction of No. 1’s exact 1947 core barrel.

    SLBCORE
  21. SLB Energy Glossary: drillstem test

    Technical definition of drillstem testing. The animation is conceptual and does not supply a missing No. 1 pressure record.

    SLBDST
  22. SLB Energy Glossary: DST pressure chart

    Technical description of test opening, fluid-column effects and shut-in pressure recovery. The plotted curve is illustrative and uncalibrated.

    SLBDSTCHART
  23. SLB Energy Glossary: electrical log

    General explanation of electrical logging. No original No. 1 log trace or modern logging suite is invented.

    SLBLOG
  24. SLB, The Defining Series: Defining and Determining Permeability

    Technical explanation of permeability and connected pore space. No numerical pore size, flow rate or permeability is assigned to No. 1 from the conceptual graphics.

    SLBPERM
  25. SLB Energy Glossary: reflection

    Technical definition of seismic reflection. Illustrated travel paths and signals are conceptual, not recovered 1946 survey traces or a direct picture of oil.

    SLBREFLECTION
  26. Imperial: Strathcona Neighbour News 2019, refinery origins

    Imperial’s retrospective on the 1948 Edmonton refinery. That early facility is distinguished from the modern Strathcona refinery built in 1975.

    STRATHCONA
  27. W. W. Waring and D. B. Layer, Devonian Dolomitized Reef D-3 Reservoir Leduc Field, Alberta, Canada

    Later operator account of the D-3 reservoir. The discussion describes development of the deeper reef rather than the original Nisku interval of No. 1.

    WARING1954