Deep Williston Basin: two different Dakota campaigns

Research reviewed 9 October 2026. Unlock both prospects after banking two Canadian producers. These are composite geological game sections: depths, measurements, costs, probabilities and casing dimensions are fictional. They do not describe an individual permitted well.

North Dakota: Bakken, Three Forks and Duperow

The Middle Bakken target sits between organic-rich upper and lower shales; the game represents a tight mixed silt/sand/carbonate reservoir. The Upper Three Forks is a separate dolomitic target, not another name for the Bakken. Its mixed carbonate–siliciclastic succession has competing restricted-marine and continental playa/sabkha depositional interpretations. The player must land, maintain lateral contact, verify a liner and fund staged stimulation plus a sustained flow test. A show or high gamma alone never earns production.

The deeper Duperow option represents carbonate–evaporite cycles. Pore development, structure and seal determine the prospect; deeper drilling does not guarantee better pay.

Why more than three casing strings?

EERC reported in 2020 that local Inyan Kara overpressure prompted operators to add a Dakota isolation string and enlarge the upper wellbore. It is a local drilling challenge, not a claim that every Dakota well needs the same design.

Game stringPurpose
SurfaceProtect shallow water-bearing cover; verify cement and integrity.
Dakota isolationIsolate the Inyan Kara interval before deeper drilling.
IntermediateSeparate the next section and reassess the pressure / loss window.
Contingency liner, when requiredA diagnosed narrow window adds a fifth string to the schedule and budget.
Production string / lateral linerProvide completion isolation before perforating or stimulating.

The game includes pressure evidence ahead of the Dakota sands, a four-versus-five-string review, and a deep-trip monitoring decision. Increasing density without checking the loss limit can cause losses; ignoring an influx can escalate to an emergency and loss of the well. Extra strings have their own casing stop, cost, integrity decision and visible track.

South Dakota: Harding County / Buffalo analogue

The state's dated 2022 field table documents Red River oil in Harding County, including Buffalo. The game therefore offers Red River B and D dolomite targets with anhydrite sealing, hard-rock wear and water-contact uncertainty. It does not portray South Dakota as the established deep North Dakota Bakken core. Porosity logs, fluid samples and production testing help distinguish connected oil from wet or disconnected pores.

Other geological interests

Area / intervalResearch-led expansion opportunity
North Dakota Madison / Mission CanyonCarbonate facies, diagenesis and water-contact appraisal.
Dickinson-area LodgepoleLocalized carbonate mound / bioherm targets; avoid treating mound pay as a continuous sheet.
Duperow / BirdbearDolomitized carbonate cycles, evaporite seals and structural or stratigraphic trapping.
Red River / Interlake / Winnipeg Black IslandDeeper carbonate or basal sandstone exploration; reservoir quality and local trap evidence must be established separately.
South Dakota Fall River / Custer MinnelusaA different, shallower producing region documented in the 2022 table; not the Harding County Red River model.

Only the five targets in the two new campaign cards are playable in this release; this table identifies further research opportunities.

Primary sources